All Nonfiction
- Bullying
- Books
- Academic
- Author Interviews
- Celebrity interviews
- College Articles
- College Essays
- Educator of the Year
- Heroes
- Interviews
- Memoir
- Personal Experience
- Sports
- Travel & Culture
All Opinions
- Bullying
- Current Events / Politics
- Discrimination
- Drugs / Alcohol / Smoking
- Entertainment / Celebrities
- Environment
- Love / Relationships
- Movies / Music / TV
- Pop Culture / Trends
- School / College
- Social Issues / Civics
- Spirituality / Religion
- Sports / Hobbies
All Hot Topics
- Bullying
- Community Service
- Environment
- Health
- Letters to the Editor
- Pride & Prejudice
- What Matters
- Back
Summer Guide
- Program Links
- Program Reviews
- Back
College Guide
- College Links
- College Reviews
- College Essays
- College Articles
- Back
Review of "My Sacred Space"
In Philip L.'s writing "My Sacred Space," he writes about why animals are good and why they should be protected. Philip explains how humans are ruining animals’ habitats, and I completely agree. He said, "We're all part of one huge Earth that can't be replaced, so why would we destroy it?" I agree and I think more people should think this way because if not the Earth will die. However, I do disagree when he says, "Hunters say they're "controlling the population," but what if a snake came up and bit one of your family members and they died? If the snakes excuse was "I'm controlling the population," I don't think you would like snakes anymore." Because I live in an area with so many hunters, I understand the value of them. Hunters keep the population of animals down because without them almost all wildlife would perish. Overpopulation would occur and it would be bad for people and wildlife. I agree with the author’s message, but I think his examples could be more logical.
Similar Articles
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
This article has 0 comments.