This particular article contains some truth but also has some bias. Yes, Michael Vick did do some horrible things to animals but that doesn't mean that he should never be allowed to play the game that he loves ever again. He did the time and he needs to learn from it and move on. Just because the writer of the article seemed to have a personal vendetta against Vick doesn't mean that's how everybody in the world feels about him. Just like the fan who gave his support to Vick. The writer of the article attacked this particular fan saying he should be punished as well for just showing his support. The article should not contain so much personal opinion.